Conservation of bio-diversity appears to come at a price. But
who really bears this cost?
The
current friction which exists between conservation policies and indigenous
communities is evident in the experiences of the Sengwer and Ogiek peoples in
Kenya. Cherangani Hills in western Kenya, is home to several indigenous peoples
including the Sengwer community. However, Kenya's conservation policies have
resulted in alienation of indigenous peoples from their lands.
"We
have been facing a lot of human rights violations, forceful evictions from our
forest homes...and as a result we do not have a place where we can sit and say
'This is our home'," says
Milka Chepkorir Kuto, herself a Sengwer, and a participant in the 2016 UN Human
Rights Office Indigenous Fellowship Programme.
Many
indigenous peoples around the world experience the same plight. They are
violently displaced away from their traditional territories without their free,
prior and informed consent, without satisfactory provisions for resettlement
and without any adequate compensation. Consequently, they are denied their
cultural rights and their means of livelihood. If they attempt to return to
these lands, they are often arrested for poaching or even killed by
'eco-guards'.
These are some of the observations made by the Special
Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Victoria Tauli-Corpuz in her recently released report which explores challenges that
indigenous peoples face from conservation programs and policies. The report
also identifies a number of other countries where policies on protected areas
have adversely affected the rights of indigenous peoples. Tauli-Corpuz
highlights legal developments, commitments and measures taken by conservation
organizations and States to advance a human-rights based approach to
conservation.
"The
key justification used by several States and conservation organizations to
displace indigenous peoples is that they overgraze and overuse natural
resources and this is considered the main obstacle to conservation", notes
Tauli-Corpuz. "Such perception fails to
recognize the complexity of ecological and social relationships of many
indigenous peoples with their ecosystems and their right to own, manage and
control these territories, lands and resources."
"This
also ignores the increasing number of studies which show that territories of
indigenous peoples who have been given land rights have been significantly
better conserved than the adjacent lands," she explains.
"Indigenous
peoples claim that they value nature more than others because this is the basis
of their survival as distinct peoples and cultures, of their traditional food
systems and knowledge systems," says the Special Rapporteur. "Evidence
also shows that many of the world's existing better conserved forests,
savannahs and waters are found in indigenous peoples' territories," she adds.
On the
threats to protected areas, Tauli-Corpuz believes that these include, "extractive industries,
logging (both legal and illegal), expansion of agribusiness plantations, and
mega-energy and infrastructure projects which are undertaken without obtaining
the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples who are directly
affected."
The
Special Rapporteur reiterates that "respect of indigenous peoples
rights should be integral in all policy decisions and programmes related to
protected areas made by States, conservation organizations and donors,
especially when these protected areas overlap with indigenous peoples'
territories."
Tauli-Corpuz
will discuss this report at the 2016 International Union of Conservation of
Nature - World Conservation Congress to be held in Hawaii from 1-10 September
2016.

No comments:
Post a Comment