Saturday, 24 December 2016
Thursday, 8 December 2016
Court grants order to arrest, sack Amaechi, Onu
Justice Ahmed
Mohammed of the Federal High Court, Abuja Division has granted an order of
mandamus seeking the arrest and immediate sack of Minister of Transportation,
Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi and his Science and Technology counterpart, Ogbonnaya
Onu, over recent allegations levelled against them by two justices of the
Supreme Court.
The applicant, Human Rights
Foundation International, sought the order in its substantive suit where it
prayed the court to compel the Department of State Services (DSS) and the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to “perform their statutory
obligations” by immediately arresting and prosecuting the two ministers.
The group also sought an
order of mandamus compelling President Muhammadu Buhari to immediately sack
both ministers “in the interest of the public and morality” based on
allegations of attempts to influence court decisions as claimed by the two
jurists.
A copy of the enrolled order made on
December 1 specifically called for the disengagement of the ministers pending
when they were cleared by a court of competent jurisdiction.
The plaintiff further asked for an order of mandamus under
the reviewed Administrative Action/Inaction Procedure, to first seek and obtain
the leave of court through an ex-parte application to properly commence the
suit.
In the relief sought, the plaintiff raised the following
questions: “Whether or not the allegation made by Justices Inyang Okoro and
Sylvester N. Ngwuta in connection with the criminal-like invasion of their
houses by the DSS on allegation of corruption, which the matter is already in
the public domain, should be investigated and those arrested be prosecuted by
the third and fourth defendants.
“Whether or not the allegation is a reasonable ground to
warrant the 5th defendant, which is the President of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria and who claims that his administration is fighting corruption, to sack
or compel Amaechi and Onu to resign from office as ministers pending when they
are cleared of every allegation of corruption.”
Both justices had in two separate correspondences to former
Chief Justice Mahmud Mohammed accused the ministers of attempting to influence
court decisions in some election cases between 2015 and this year.
The matter has, however, been slated for mention on December
15.
http://guardian.ng/news/court-grants-order-to-arrest-sack-amaechi-onu/
Monday, 5 December 2016
ROOT CAUSES OF THE BIAFRA STRUGGLE. --- By Femi Aribasala
In the eight years of Obasanjo’s presidency,
there was no headline-grabbing demand for Biafra. Ditto for the eight years of
the Yar’Adua/Jonathan presidency. However, within months of Buhari’s
presidency, the Igbo demand for Biafra has become deafening.
Without
a doubt, the blame for this new impetus must be laid firmly at the doorstep of
President Buhari. Moreover, rather than attenuate it, the president and the APC
have exacerbated separatist tendencies in the country.
This was part of the reason why people like me
did not support Buhari’s election as president of Nigeria. I have written
severally in Vanguard that Nigeria must remain a united nation. In my column of
4th March, 2014 entitled: “Re-inventing Igbo Politics in Nigeria,” I maintained
that: “Nigeria cannot survive without the Igbo.” The following week on 11th
March 2014, I wrote another article entitled: “Nigeria Cannot Do without the
North.”
I remain persuaded by both positions. But if
Nigeria is indeed to remain united, there are certain things that must be said
and done. The problem with the Buhari administration is that it seems totally
impervious to these imperatives.
Second-class treatment
Second-class treatment
There is no question that, as one of the major
ethnic groups in Nigeria, the Igbo have been hard done by. Since the civil war
45 years ago, they have been treated as if they were a minority ethnic group in
Nigeria when in fact they are one of the majorities. No Igbo has been
considered worthy of being head-of-state. The South East of Ndigbo is the only
one of the six geopolitical zones of the country with five states. All other
zones have six or more. Indeed, the number of local governments in the
North-East is virtually double that of the South-East.
As a result, the Ndigbo receive the smallest
amount of revenue allocation among all the zones, in spite of the fact that
some of the South-eastern states are among the oil-producing states.
The roads in the South-east are notoriously
bad. Government after government have simply ignored them. Inconsequential
ministerial positions are usually zoned to Ndigbo. Time was when it seemed the
lackluster Ministry of Information was their menial preserve. It is also a
known fact that every so often the Igbo are slaughtered in the North under one
guise or the other. Many are forced to abandon their homes and businesses and
run for dear life. The people who perpetrate these acts never seem to be
arrested or prosecuted.
When a major tribe is treated procedurally as
second-class in their own country, there will be a demand for
self-determination sooner rather than later. When a group of people feel unsafe
in their own country, they cannot but be expected to decide to opt out. It is
not the responsibility of the government to imprison the Igbo in Nigeria. It is
the responsibility of the government to ensure and guarantee that they feel
safe and are treated with respect.
Discrimination
against the South: While these issues have been brewing under the surface for
some time, the lop-sided tendencies of President Buhari have brought them all
out to boiling-point. In his first-coming as head-of-state in 1984, Buhari
antagonised Ndigbo by locking up Vice-President Alex Ekwueme, an Igbo man, in
jail in Kirikiri; while President Shehu Shagari, a Fulani man was only placed
under house arrest. In addition, Buhariarrested and jailed Ojukwu, another Igbo icon for no just cause.
As Chairman of the Petroleum Trust Fund, Buhari
discriminated blatantly against the South and especially the South-east. For
example, his PTF built only 4,440 kilometres of roads in Southern Nigeria
representing a paltry 24%; while 13,870 kilometres were built in the North
representing 76%. Of these figures, the Southeast and South-south combined only
received 13.5%.
Under the PTF’s National Health and Rehabilitation
Programme, NHERP, the entire South got 0% allocation, while the North got 100%
in the tertiary programme. In the vocational programme, the entire South had
only 3% while the North had 97%. The same was for the primary side where the
South had only 12% but the North was allocated 88%. The secondary area was no
different. While the North had 86% percent, the South had just 14%.
Disenfranchisement of Ndigbo
Disenfranchisement of Ndigbo
These anomalies have been duplicated to date in
the seven months of Buhari’s presidency. In the first place, Buhari won
virtually without Igbo votes. In order to diminish Jonathan’s votes, a major
assault was made against them; recognising that they are some of the staunchest
Jonathan supporters. INEC ensured that, far more disproportionately relative to
other geopolitical zones, millions of South-East voters disappeared between
2011 and 2015.
Only 7.6 million voters were registered for the
2015 election in the South-east, and only 5.6 million PVCs collected. Compare
this with Buhari’s North-west, there were 17.6 million registrations and 15.1
million collections. While in the South-west, there were 4.2 million votes in
2015, relative to 4.6 million in 2011: in the South-east, there were only 2.6
million votes in 2015, relative to 5 million in 2011; a drastic drop of 2.4
million.
While Kano, Katsina, Kaduna, Jigawa and Bauchi
posted their traditional humongous figures; Imo, Anambra and Abia posted
relatively disappointing figures. While the internally displaced Northerners in
the North-East could vote; internally displaced Igbos from the North could not.
While the card-readers failed in many parts of the South-east, suggestive they
were programmed to fail; they worked in most parts of the North. In places like
Lagos and Kano, many non-indigenes, including the Igbo, were not even given
their PVCs.
Making of a hero: President Buhari then added
insult to injury by stating on his visit to the United States that he could not
be expected to treat those who voted for him in the same way as those who did
not.
He said: “(Going by election results),
constituencies that gave me 97% cannot in all honesty be treated, on some
issues, with constituencies that gave me 5%. I think these are political
realities. While, certainly there will be justice for everybody but the people
who voted, and made their votes count, they must feel the government has
appreciated the effort they put in putting the government in place.”
While his media assistants later tried to water
down this disturbing statement, the reality was that, apart from the
constitutionally-stipulated requirement that every state must be represented in
the presidential Cabinet, Buhari has virtually ignored the Igbo in his
appointments.
Two moves showed the level of insensitivity of
the Buhari administration to these anomalies. The first was the decision to
move Boko Haram prisoners down from the North to the South-east; a move firmly
resisted by the Igbo as it would have made them a target of suicide-bombers.
The other was the blunder of placing Nnamdi Kanu, the director of Radio Biafra,
under arrest; charging him with treason and terrorism.
All the government has achieved by this is
inflame passions in the South-east. It has also made a hero out of Kanu. Those
who did not know about Kanu before now know him. Those who were not disposed to
Biafra before are now shouting Biafra. For weeks on end, Biafra has become the
biggest news item nationwide, with agitations, demonstrations, threats and
arrests.
Agenda for action: The government needs to
apply more wisdom here. At the moment, it has become the biggest promoter of
Biafra by the way it has gone about things. The idea of Biafra cannot be killed
with a sledge hammer, if at all. What is required is to address the root causes
that impelled Biafra. Unfortunately, it would appear the Buhari administration
is unwilling to do this.
As a matter of urgency, Nnamdi Kanu must be
released unconditionally. If the government persists in labeling him a
terrorist, his supporters might decide to become terrorists. Nigeria already
has enough problem of Boko Haram conflagration in the North-east. We cannot
afford to light another fire in the South-east.
Kanu was living in England. If he were a
terrorist, he would have been arrested there. The fact that he lived there
without constraints or restraints shows he was not considered a threat, either
to Britain or to Nigeria.
It is not a crime to fight for self-determination; it is a right. The government must not give the impression that Nigeria is a prison where we must all live, irrespective of the living conditions. The government needs to address the grievances of the Igbo. Their roads and bridges must be built. Their waterways must be opened up to the Atlantic Ocean.
It is not a crime to fight for self-determination; it is a right. The government must not give the impression that Nigeria is a prison where we must all live, irrespective of the living conditions. The government needs to address the grievances of the Igbo. Their roads and bridges must be built. Their waterways must be opened up to the Atlantic Ocean.
Eastern sea-ports must be developed. Railways
must link their mercantile cities to the North. Their coal resources must be
profitably exploited for the benefit of their unemployed youth and citizenry.
An additional state must be created in the South-east to bring it up to par
with other geopolitical zones.
National question
Moreover, we need to revisit again a critical
issue addressed during the truncated National Conference: the issue of resource
allocation. This is a major gripe of the Igbo and it is a legitimate gripe. It
is not in the interest of Nigeria to continue in this age-old practice where
all the states gather every month in Abuja for handouts, whether they are
productive or not. This gives the wrong impression that some states are
insisting on being piggy-backed by others. We need to develop a system that
rewards and encourages productivity.
Those who produce should be allowed to keep
disproportionately what they produce, instead of the current situation where
they are required to share it disproportionately with those relatively less
productive. The truth of the matter is that every part of Nigeria is resource
rich. Every part of Nigeria has the requisite manpower. Unfortunately, our
current over-concentration on oil militates against the development of other
indigenous resources.
A situation where national resources are distributed
according to the number of local government councils, and where there is now
supposedly only 96 local government councils in the South-East, relative to 186
in the North-west does not suggest equity and justice.
The disgruntlement in the South-east about the Nigeria project will not disappear by ignoring it. It will not disappear by arresting Kanu. It will not disappear by issuing threats. Neither will it disappear by denying the youth of the South-east their freedom of speech and assembly.
The disgruntlement in the South-east about the Nigeria project will not disappear by ignoring it. It will not disappear by arresting Kanu. It will not disappear by issuing threats. Neither will it disappear by denying the youth of the South-east their freedom of speech and assembly.
Today, the demand for Biafra remains the demand
of a minority of the Igbo. If the root causes of their anger are not addressed,
the minority will soon become the majority. If that happens, Nigeria might
unravel. I repeat what I have stated before: the Nigeria of our manifest
destiny cannot be realised without the biafrans.
Nigeria envies growth of Igbo people
Professor Chinedu Nebo has said that Igbo need
to unite to be strong
Professor Chinedu Nebo who is the former minister of power has
revealed that the reason Igbos are being hated in Nigeria is because of their
level of development and growth.
Vanguard reports that the former vice chancellor of the
University of Nigeria said there would have been no Nigeria without Igbo people
as they were made by God specially to develop the economy.
Nebo made this assertion at the South East
Development and Leadership Initiative (SELDI) 2016 in Enugu with the theme “Integrating the Southeast Economy for Sustainable Growth and
Development
He said the resourcefulness, dignity of labour
and rich cultural heritage of the Igbo people have made them the envy of other
Nigerians.
He said: “Nigeria
is angry with the Igbo’s growth and development. It is obvious. It is only in
Nigeria that a traditional ruler will open his mouth and say that if you do not
vote for this person, then we will drown you and throw you into the lagoon. A
traditional ruler who is suppose to be the promoter of peace and custodian of
the people’s culture and tradition”.
“It is high time we woke up and believed in ourselves. The Igbos
are great people all over the world. About 80% of Igbo wealth is in the
Diaspora. We invest outside the country without coming back home. We need to
adopt the “think home philosophy”, come back home and develop our land.
“We need to build and develop love for one another. The
philosophy of “igwebuike” (togetherness) is still there. There shall be
capacity for mentorship for our younger generation. The former Minister, who
described the summit as timely and apt, also advocated for an improved
educational system that will ensure that capable individuals are produced from
institutions of learning.
“We need to build an educational system that is relevant. It is
not just enough to churn out graduates into the labour market. We need to
develop our education system and curriculum in science, innovation and
mathematics."
The lead promoter of SELDI, Mr Ikenna Modebelu, said: “SELDI’s vision recognizes the
challenges of the southeast region and aims to tackle them by promoting
leadership that will foster development in areas of investment, infrastructure
development, economic growth, value re-orientation, emerging market
opportunities and youth empowerment through intensive advocacy campaigns”
The promoters of SELDI believe that there is
leadership deficit across all classes in the region including elites who have
failed to lead by example. SELDI is committed to the “Think home, build
home” philosophy and believes that time has come for the southeasterners to
come together and join hands in developing the region for the good of present
and future generations,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



